Page Table 1
This page is a generated reference surface for selective reading. It exists to keep the learner apps guide-first while still preserving source access.
Learning objectives
- Explain the main ideas and vocabulary in Page Table 1.
- Work through the source examples for Page Table 1 without depending on raw chunk order.
- Use Page Table 1 as selective reference when learner modules point back to Ostep.
Prerequisites
- None curated yet.
Module targets
module-02-memory-management-virtual-memory
AI companion modes
- Explain simply
- Socratic tutor
- Quiz me
- Challenge my understanding
- Diagnose my confusion
- Generate extra practice
- Revision mode
- Connect forward / backward
Source-of-truth note
This unit is anchored to Ostep and the source chapter "Page Table 1". Use external resources only to clarify, extend, or modernize details without replacing the chapter's conceptual spine.
External enrichment
No chapter-specific enrichment resources are curated yet. Add them in the unit manifest when a source clearly improves learning.
Source provenance
- Primary source:
Ostep - Source chapter: Page Table 1
- Raw source file:
085-1124-pagetable-1.md
Merged source
Page Table 1
1124 PageTable[1]
Page Table (PA) 1024 40100 7332 mov 40050 7282
Array (VA) Array (PA) 40000 7232 1124 4196 inc jne mov cmp 1074 4146
Code (VA) Code (PA) 1024 4096 0 10 20 30 40 50
Memory Access
Figure 18.7:A Virtual (And Physical) Memory Trace
All we need to know now are the contents of the page table, and its location in physical memory. Let's assume we have a linear (array-based) page table and that it is located at physical address 1KB (1024).
As for its contents, there are just a few virtual pages we need to worry about having mapped for this example. First, there is the virtual page the code lives on. Because the page size is 1KB, virtual address 1024 resides
on the second page of the virtual address space (VPN=1, as VPN=0 is
the first page). Let's assume this virtual page maps to physical frame 4 (VPN 1→PFN 4).
Next, there is the array itself. Its size is 4000 bytes (1000 integers), and we assume that it resides at virtual addresses 40000 through 44000 (not including the last byte). The virtual pages for this decimal range are
VPN=39 ... VPN=42. Thus, we need mappings for these pages. Let's assume these virtual-to-physical mappings for the example:(VPN 39→PFN 7), (VPN 40→PFN 8), (VPN 41→PFN 9), (VPN 42→PFN 10).
We are now ready to trace the memory references of the program.
When it runs, each instruction fetch will generate two memory references:
one to the page table to find the physical frame that the instruction resides within, and one to the instruction itself to fetch it to the CPU for processing. In addition, there is one explicit memory reference in the form of themovinstruction; this adds another page table access first (to translate the array virtual address to the correct physical one) and then the array access itself.
The entire process, for the first five loop iterations, is depicted in Figure 18.7 (page 10). The bottom most graph shows the instruction memory references on the y-axis in black (with virtual addresses on the left, and the actual physical addresses on the right); the middle graph shows array accesses in dark gray (again with virtual on left and physical on right); finally, the topmost graph shows page table memory accesses in light gray (just physical, as the page table in this example resides in physical memory). The x-axis, for the entire trace, shows memory accesses across the first five iterations of the loop; there are 10 memory accesses per loop, which includes four instruction fetches, one explicit update of memory, and five page table accesses to translate those four fetches and one explicit update.
See if you can make sense of the patterns that show up in this visualization. In particular, what will change as the loop continues to run beyond these first five iterations? Which new memory locations will be accessed? Can you figure it out?
This has just been the simplest of examples (only a few lines of C code), and yet you might already be able to sense the complexity of understanding the actual memory behavior of real applications. Don't worry: it definitely gets worse, because the mechanisms we are about to introduce only complicate this already complex machinery. Sorry3!