Skip to main content

Graduation claim audit and independent defense — assessment

Score 0 absent/incorrect, 1 prompted/incomplete, 2 independently supported with explicit limits, 3 justified fresh transfer. Every category requires at least 2; a high average cannot hide a missing category.

Required evidence​

  • GD1 — Traceability: Map every material claim to revision-specific evidence and limits; distinguish proposal/model/measurement.
  • GD2 — Privacy: Sanitize credentials, personal information and private reviewer content without concealing limitations.
  • GD3 — Case study: Retain original problem/decisions/build/verification/operations narrative with inspectable artifacts.
  • GD4 — Defense: Record the walkthrough and fresh questions with honest repair of unsupported answers.
  • GD5 — External review: Obtain actual credible human review and close all blocking findings with evidence.
  • GD6 — Transfer: Choose specialization from demonstrated strengths/gaps while leaving no core graduation requirement silently waived.

Calibration​

A local load test supports only its stated workload and environment. A proposed multi-region design is not a deployed system. AI feedback is useful assistance but cannot fill the independent-person requirement. If a blocking finding or mandatory runtime gate remains, graduation stays pending regardless of portfolio polish.

Delayed transfer and integrity​

After at least 48 hours, have a reviewer change one assumption or select a previously unseen failure. Predict the outcome, collect fresh evidence and explain discrepancies without the calibration text. Preserve mistakes, repairs, collaboration and generated-assistance disclosures. Record unavailable tools or reviewers as pending evidence, never fabricated completion. Author reference checks are not learner runtime experiments.