Module 3: Probability & Statistics: Mistake Clinic
This clinic turns wrong moves into reusable judgment. Use it after each practice page and again before the quiz or checkpoint.
Module-Specific Mistake Radar
Start with these traps. Replace or extend them with real mistakes from your own work.
| Mistake to look for | Where it shows up | Symptom | Repair evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finishing Probability Modeling and Conditioning Lab with only a final answer | Probability Modeling and Conditioning Lab | The work has no failed case, trace, test, proof gap, or design stress point. | Add the smallest broken example and show the repair that changes the result. |
| Finishing Random Variables and Distribution Workshop with only a final answer | Random Variables and Distribution Workshop | The work has no failed case, trace, test, proof gap, or design stress point. | Add the smallest broken example and show the repair that changes the result. |
| Finishing Expectation, Variance, and Statistical Reasoning Clinic with only a final answer | Expectation, Variance, and Statistical Reasoning Clinic | The work has no failed case, trace, test, proof gap, or design stress point. | Add the smallest broken example and show the repair that changes the result. |
| Finishing Code Katas with only a final answer | Code Katas | The work has no failed case, trace, test, proof gap, or design stress point. | Add the smallest broken example and show the repair that changes the result. |
| Treating Probability Starts with a Well-Defined Model as vocabulary instead of a tool | Probability Starts with a Well-Defined Model | The explanation names the concept but cannot decide between two cases. | Write one example, one non-example, and the rule that separates them. |
| Treating Counting Models, Equally Likely Outcomes, and Event Algebra as vocabulary instead of a tool | Counting Models, Equally Likely Outcomes, and Event Algebra | The explanation names the concept but cannot decide between two cases. | Write one example, one non-example, and the rule that separates them. |
Practice Mistake Checks
Pull any miss from these checks into your mistake log.
Probability Modeling and Conditioning Lab
Source: practice/01-probability-modeling-and-conditioning-lab.md
For each statement, identify the error:
- "There are three possible sums when two coins are flipped: 0, 1, 2, so each has probability
1/3." - "The test is 99% accurate, so a positive result means a 99% chance the disease is present."
- "Events that cannot happen together are independent."
- "At least one failure means add the failure probabilities directly."
Random Variables and Distribution Workshop
Source: practice/02-random-variables-and-distribution-workshop.md
For each statement, identify the error:
- "A random variable is just the event written with a capital letter."
- "Sampling without replacement from a finite deck is binomial because there are only two outcomes."
- "
P(X <= 3)is the same thing asP(X = 3)if the support is discrete." - "The Poisson model is correct whenever the answer is a count."
Expectation, Variance, and Statistical Reasoning Clinic
Source: practice/03-expectation-variance-and-statistical-reasoning-clinic.md
For each statement, identify the error:
- "Linearity of expectation requires independence."
- "Since the expected value is 3.5, the next roll is likely to be 3.5 in effect."
- "Zero covariance always implies independence."
- "A 95% confidence interval means a 95% probability the fixed parameter is inside it."
- "The LLN means a tail is due after many heads."
Repair Protocol
For each real mistake:
- Reproduce the failure on the smallest example, trace, proof, query, command, or design sketch.
- Name the hidden assumption.
- Repair the artifact.
- Save evidence that changed: failing then passing test, corrected proof step, revised diagram, safer command, benchmark, or review note.
- Add one retrieval card beginning with Check... before... or Do not use... when....
Mistake Log
| Date | Mistake | Symptom | Root cause | Repair evidence | Retrieval card |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | Pick one radar row above | Explain how it would fail in this module | Name the assumption | Add a counterexample or corrected artifact | Write the card before closing the page |
Completion Standard
- At least five real mistakes are logged.
- At least two mistakes include a counterexample or failing test.
- At least one mistake connects to an older semester skill.
- At least one correction changes code, a proof, a diagram, a command transcript, a query, or a design decision.